Brief: Aida Tushemereirwe & Anor v. Yosamu Rubyakana & Ors

---

Topic: Locus Standi of Beneficiaries to a Deceased’s Estate

Date of Judgment: 28 June 2024

Court: High Court of Uganda at Mbarara

Case Number/Citation: HCT-05-LD-CS-0067-2019, 2024 UGHC 553

Judge: Hon. Justice Nshimye Allan Paul M.

Summary Facts of the Case

The Plaintiffs, Aida Tushemereirwe Bajuna and Efurance Kapila are biological daughters and beneficiaries of the late Erifazi Bikiremire’s estate.

They filed this suit against the defendants, Yosamu Rubyakana, Yonasani Rwabiino, John Tuhamize, and the Commissioner of Land Registration, seeking declarations that the defendants’ actions in distributing the estate were null and void.

They also sought orders for the cancellation of the defendants’ proprietorship over certain properties, an account of the estate, and damages.

The plaintiffs argued that the defendants, who are their brothers and co-beneficiaries, unlawfully distributed and transferred the estate property without letters of administration.

The defendants contended that the second defendant holds valid letters of administration, which had not been revoked.

At the hearing, the defendants raised a preliminary objection as to the locus standi of the plaintiffs in bringing the suit, arguing that beneficiaries to a deceased’s estate have no right to regarding the estate where letters of administration of the estate have been granted and not revoked.

Legal Issues Before the Court

• Whether the plaintiffs have locus standi to file the Suit

The Decision of the Court

The Court held that beneficiaries of an estate have the right to sue to protect their interests, even without letters of administration, as established in the Supreme Court precedent of Israel Kabwa vs Martin Banoba Musiga (SCCA No. 52/1995).

The Court found that the plaintiffs have a sufficient interest in the estate and therefore have the locus standi to bring the suit.

The Court also considered that the plaintiffs framed their case partly on the basis that estate property was shared and transferred illegally before any letters of administration were issued.

Referencing Babumba and Ors v. Ssali Babumba (High Court Civil Suit No. 78 of 2012), the Court upheld the principle that a Beneficiary can file a suit, including against the Administrator of the Estate, if Estate Property is illegally alienated or is being mismanaged.

Key Quote: “I find that basing on the allegations in the pleadings and the orders sought by the parties, it is in the interest of justice and within the law that the suit is heard. In that regard, I accordingly overrule the preliminary objection by the 1^st to the 3^rd defendants.” – Justice Nshimye Allan Paul

Law Applied by the Court:

• Section 5 of the Civil Procedure Act
• Section 234(1) of the Succession Act as amended
• Section 264 of the Succession Act
• Order 2 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules
• Order 31 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules
• Israel Kabwa vs Martin Banoba Musiga (SCCA No. 52/1995)
• Babumba and Ors v. Ssali Babumba (High Court Civil Suit No. 78 of 2012

Counsel on Record

For the Plaintiffs: Advocate Arinaitwe Ambrose from M/s Bwatota Bashonga & Co Advocates/Solicitors

For the Defendants: Advocate Kandebe Ntambirweki from M/s Ntambirweki Kandebe & Co. Advocates

Conclusion

This case illustrates the legal principle that beneficiaries have a right to sue to protect their interests in an estate, even without letters of administration.

Case Download Link

---

Share, print, or bookmark this Case Summary