Home » Case Brief: Muwonge & Another v Goldsmith

Case Brief: Muwonge & Another v Goldsmith

Main Topic (s): Security for costs

Summary of the Facts:

The Applicants, John Bosco Muwonge and Herbert Muwonge applied (in Miscellaneous Application 3018 of 2023) for an order requiring the Respondent, Goldsmith Peter (formerly Namakajo Patrick Senfuma, trading as Kampala Nursery and Day Care Centre), to furnish security for costs…

Subscriber content

LegalReports is on it, so you are too.

A LegalReports subscription puts you at the centre of Uganda's commercial and corporate law: the disputes, decisions, deals and people shaping practice, reported with context and insight.

A subscription includes:

Unlimited access to all subscriber-level articles
Advertising-free content
Stay abreast of current commercial and corporate legal developments, with professional, actionable insight and analysis
Save professional time searching and monitoring courts and regulators
Discover important cases without searching extensively
Follow emerging commercial and corporate law issues
Regular professional awareness
Support current client and professional conversations
Searchable archives of historical content

Subscribe from UGX 29,900/month Institutional access

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Topics: Security for Costs

HIV NGO “SFO” Faces Threat Of Eviction From Land As Court Refuses to Stop Landlord From Pursuing Rent Arrears

Oct 19, 2026

Despite NGO claiming its landlord had attempted to evict it and was in the process of selling the land before Appeal, Judge opts for formal court process of execution.

Share, print, or bookmark this Article

Liquidation of An Insolvent Business Is Not Always the Best Solution, Court Says

Oct 14, 2026

This does not mean that a company must be saved at all costs.

Share, print, or bookmark this Article

A Case Based On A Wrongfully Registered Industrial Design Is Self-Defeating

Oct 11, 2026

Without a validly registered industrial design, the statutory basis for a law suit is lost, rendering the suit not mantainable.

Share, print, or bookmark this Article

A Director Can’t Sign Off A Mortgage For A Company Without Its Power of Attorney – Supreme Court

Oct 1, 2026

The Court rejected Advocate Joseph Kyazze’s argument that the power of attorney requirement only applies to a mortgagor/registered owner of land and not the mortgagee/lender.

Share, print, or bookmark this Article

Stay informed

Get alerts for the practice areas you follow.

Case Brief: Muwonge & Another v Goldsmith

Related

HIV NGO “SFO” Faces Threat Of Eviction From Land As Court Refuses to Stop Landlord From Pursuing Rent Arrears

Liquidation of An Insolvent Business Is Not Always the Best Solution, Court Says

A Case Based On A Wrongfully Registered Industrial Design Is Self-Defeating

A Director Can’t Sign Off A Mortgage For A Company Without Its Power of Attorney – Supreme Court

More from LegalReports

The Advocate Who Is Always Busy But Broke

Ubuntu Philosophy as a Tool to Promote Mental Health Among Lawyers in Uganda

Customs Bonds, Like Other Performance Guarantees, Are Independent of Their Underlying Contracts, Court Says

General damages for breach of contract? Lessons from Kenya and Uganda

Services

Coverage

About

Email updates