The Court held that Claims brought outside the prescribed limitation period are not maintainable unless specific exceptions, such as fraud or mistake, are pleaded and proved.
The court held that the right to one’s image (likeness,name, voice, etc) is an unnegotiable personal right protected under the right to privacy enshrined in the Constitution’s Article 27
The respondents challenged the constitutionality of the provision after their land was compulsorily acquired by UNRA without prompt prior compensation.
An unstamped instrument cannot form the basis of legal claims beyond the parties to that instrument.
